Text

Oh, and a less-cracky headcanon too.

Princess Platinum, like the other two leaders, is shown being really silly and immature in the play, but I figure a lot of that is probably exaggerated, and the historical Platinum was a competent, respected leader. Upon founding Equestria she kept the title “Princess” because she ruled as an equal with the other two tribe leaders, which continued for a time with their successors. Over time the title of Princess became elevated so much that it was respected above King or Queen, which were associated too much with the old world, and so when the current royalty was established they took on that title out of respect for her. Equestria has been ruled by princesses ever since.

Text

I’m in the process of writing up a longer post comparing the three seasons of FiM so far, and I realized a pattern in the sorts of conflicts they had and the lessons they taught. There are exceptions in each season, so it’s far from perfect, but I think it’s there.

Season one was about learning how to live with your friends. The lessons were largely interpersonal, about how to treat other ponies properly. They were all very different from each other and got into a lot of conflicts and they had to sort that out.

I think season two inverted that. I feel the focus shifted more towards the intrapersonal. Learning not to worry so much, to have pride in your home, to be responsible, to believe in yourself, to try new things, to not jump to crazy conclusions. Rather than emphasizing how to treat your friends properly, it emphasized how they help you grow and become a better person.

And season three, I feel, was to a large extent about looking back and seeing how far they’ve come and how much they’ve grown up. Twilight can pass her test and save the Crystal Empire. She can beat Trixie even without being better at magic. Rainbow Dash can show enough vulnerability and kindness to care for Scootaloo (don’t even tell me she could’ve done that in season one). She was in an episode with a brash, thoughtless, overly competetive jerk, and it wasn’t her, because she already learned that lesson. Applejack is taking on more responsibilities, organizing the family reunion and really becoming the leader of her family. Fluttershy had the strength, guile, and compassion to help Discord reform. And we all know what happened in the end. They’ve all come so far, and they’re growing into their place in the world.

It’s sort of funny, realizing this. They told us the theme of season three at the very beginning.

“Turns out you were prepared for this.”

Text

Inspiration

After drawing that picture of Pinkie Pie I was thinking a bit about how FiM handles inspiration and encouragement in general. I felt that the quote used there typifies Pinkie Pie’s methods and worldview quite well. With few exceptions, she pretty much loves everything. Consider how she happily ate Apple Bloom’s cupcakes in Call of the Cutie, for example. Pinkie Pie is very much about seeing, and celebrating, the good in everything and everypony.

But! That’s not the entire show. Rarity, for example, is absolutely nothing like that. She might be as much the opposite of that as you can get. Rarity has very precise tastes and is frequently critical of things that don’t fit those tastes. Does this mean she’s a jerk while Pinkie Pie is good? Well, sometimes. Consider Sisterhooves Social, where Rarity has to learn to be not quite so demanding towards Sweetie Belle. But it’s not JUST that Rarity shouldn’t be so demanding. In the montage at the end of the episode one of the scenes shows Sweetie Belle filling the kitchen with smoke again, but then pulling out a perfectly lovely pie for Rarity. Sweetie Belle learns something too.

Pinkie Pie would look at Sweetie Belle’s or Apple Bloom’s burned treats and gobble them up and say they did great. And that’s good. Rarity would help Sweetie Belle make something better. And that’s also good. This, I believe, is one of the core messages of the show: Good is not just one thing. There isn’t one singular ideal we must uphold, forsaking all others. If somepony feels like crap about what they do no matter what they make, they probably need Pinkie more than Rarity. If somepony offers up their work for criticism, they probably need Rarity more than Pinkie. And some people just react better to one or the other for personal reasons. Rarity and Pinkie are both good and they both have their place, and we all need a healthy dose of self-love and self-criticism in order to stay sane.

Read More

Text
Personally I don’t feel that Applejack is particularly overshadowed. She’s been the focus, or at least a focus, of five entire episodes, which is about as many as Fluttershy has had. The thing with Applejack is that she’s very responsible. In fact, in two episodes, she’s…

I would agree that Applejack doesn’t actually get that much less screentime or that many fewer episodes than the others. Somewhat less, but not a ton less.

But let’s compare Applejack episodes and Fluttershy episodes. Two of Applejack’s episodes are equally about another pony (Rarity in Look Before You Sleep, Rainbow Dash in Fall Weather Friends), and the focus is on their relationship more than either of them individually. One of them is about Applejack as the object of the plot, but actually focuses on everypony BUT her (The Last Roundup). And one of them is pretty generally an Apple family and main six episode (The Super Speedy Cider Squeezy 6000). The only one that’s about her in particular, told from her point of view, is Applebuck Season. And even that one is pretty heavily about Twilight trying to help her too.

On the other hand, the following episodes are specifically about Fluttershy and are told largely from her point of view: Stare Master, A Bird in the Hoof, Putting Your Hoof Down, and Hurricane Fluttershy. I would say that Dragonshy is mostly a main six episode where Fluttershy is particularly important to the plot, analogous to The Last Roundup. We’re not really privy to her point of view in it. And Green Isn’t Your Color is equally about her and Rarity.

On a cursory look through the episode list, I would say that Pinkie has four such episodes, Twilight has five, Rarity has four, and Rainbow has four.

So I think the difference with Applejack, and the reason people feel like she doesn’t get as much focus, is that we almost never 1) focus on her in particular, as opposed to “Applejack and Rainbow Dash” or whatever other combination, or 2) see the world through her eyes.

I don’t read episode synopses before watching them if I can help it, but I’ve seen a few titles for upcoming episodes and some of them seem promising for this to change. I like Applejack a lot so I’m hoping we’ll get to see her perspective more.

Text

Anonymous asked: So, Applejack. She's the kind of person (pony?) we'd like to befriend in real life, but she's overshadowed on the show. What's the solution to this? Or is there even one?

It’s a difficult problem. One issue that is brought up often in the fandom is that Applejack seems much more sane than the rest of the cast. Stories are driven by conflict, and characters who are nice and reasonable and stable don’t create and maintain conflict quite as well as characters who are not. However, you don’t want to make characters who are too far in the other direction, because usually we want to have characters who are reasonably likable. The rest of the cast is in a pretty good middle-ground, where they’re really likable but they also have some problems that cause a lot of conflict.

And it’s certainly not that Applejack doesn’t have problems. She can be a little mean on occasion. And she’s really proud and doesn’t back down from a challenge even if she should. But both of those problems are already covered by Rainbow Dash and Rarity, who are also generally more animated and extreme in these behaviors. Aside from that, she’s… messy? There’s probably more that could be done with that but I’m not sure it’s really compelling.

She’s a fictional character though, so she’s hardly set in stone. If the writers came up with some kind of neurosis for her that 1) fits with the rest of her character as we understand it, and 2) is an issue that hasn’t come up before so we can believe that we haven’t seen it, then that might resolve this issue.

There are also ways to make her stand out more and be more interesting without adding crazy problems. Some have pointed to her babying of the apple tree in Over a Barrel as suggesting a stranger side to her than we usually see, that perhaps she usually represses. I think developing that further, that she has a unique relationship with her trees that the others might find a little crazy, has a lot of potential for helping her stand out.

But I would also say that personality traits aren’t the only things we have to work with. One of the main reasons I find Fluttershy and Rainbow Dash interesting is their shared backstory, which has nothing to do with their personalities. Same for Twilight and Celestia, or most of all Princess Luna’s backstory. I think one thing the writers could easily do, probably more easily than making Applejack crazier, is just giving us more information on her past.

Resolving the missing parent issue would be the most obvious way to go about this. Whether they’re dead or live elsewhere or ran off, any of those things is a potential source of drama. And we can already speculate on all that, but seeing it for real in canon, and most of all seeing Applejack’s reactions to it, could really help establish her better as a character I think. Admittedly dead parents are not likely to happen, and neither are parents who abandoned their kids, but parents who are just gone a lot and are somewhat neglectful are much more doable and could still be a great source of drama. But even giving her more backstory with the family we’ve already seen could help a lot.

Finally, I would also say that it isn’t the end of the world if one character out of six isn’t quite as compelling and popular as the others. Ultimately what matters most is the cast as a whole, and even if Applejack isn’t the most interesting character in it, she still helps define the others through contrast and I think she would definitely be missed if she were gone. As a writer I know I would want to solve the problem and improve her character, but I think the issue isn’t that she’d a bad character, only that she’s a good character in a cast of great characters. And I’d understand if a writer decided that was good enough.

Text

The More the Merrier

The thing about being inactive so long is I feel like I need to come back with a big post that’s incredibly insightful and well-written and way better than anything I wrote before. That’s not likely to happen and I’d rather just get something written and get back on track with what this blog is all about instead of fretting a bunch and not writing.

So this is a small thing, but I feel like one of the things FiM does right is that six is a really good number of main characters. This may sound strange, perhaps that the quality of characters matters more than the quantity. And certainly I would say it does. But I think having a large cast of main characters as opposed to just a duo or trio can help make those characters better.

If you have two characters, it’s certainly possible to make them both detailed and round and three-dimensional. But it’s really easy not to. You can differentiate them from one another with a word apiece. One is smart, the other is dumb. One is mean, the other is kind. One is loud, the other is shy. And so on. It’s trivial to make pairs of characters in this way, and you could many tell stories using no more characterization than that. They’d just be boring and forgettable.

Read More